Abstract
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of two intensified insulin regimens, i.e., pump delivery
versus multiple daily injections in patients with type 2 diabetes not optimally controlled
with conventional insulin therapy.
Research design and methods: Seventeen type 2 diabetes patients uncontrolled by two daily injections of regular
plus NPH were randomly assigned in a cross-over fashion to either three daily injections
of lispro plus NPH or pump device delivering lispro. HbA1c, 6 points capillary blood
glucose, 24-hour continuous glucose monitoring system tracings and global satisfaction
score were evaluated at the end of each 12-week treatment period.
Results: HbA1c decreased from 9.0±1.6% to 8.6±1.6% with multiple injections and 7.7±0.8% with
pump device (p<0.03). Capillary blood glucose was lowered at all time-points with
pump, but only at morning with multiple injections (p<0.01). Compared to conventional
therapy, pump reduced hyperglycemic area under curve by 73% (p<0.01), but multiple
injections by only 32% (p=0.08). Rate of hypoglycemia was not increased and patient's
satisfaction was comparable with both intensive treatments.
Conclusions: Pump therapy provides a better metabolic control than injection regimens, and seems
to be safe and convenient in patients with type 2 diabetes who fail to respond to
conventional insulin therapy.
Key words
type 2 diabetes - continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion - Humalog Mix50 - continuous
glucose monitoring system
References
1
Janka HU, Plewe G, Kliebe-Frisch C, Schweitzer MA.
Starting insulin for type 2 diabetes with insulin glargine added to oral agents versus
twice-daily premixed insulin alone [Abstract].
Diabetologia.
2003;
46
((Suppl 2))
A268
2
Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Gerich J.
Insulin Glargine 4002 Study Investigators: the treat-to-target trial: randomized addition
of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients.
Diabetes Care.
2003;
26
3080-3086
3
Fritsche A, Schweitzer MA, Haring HU. 4001 Study Group .
Glimepiride combined with morning insulin glargine, bedtime neutral protamine hagedorn
insulin, or bedtime insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes. A randomized,
controlled trial.
Ann Intern Med.
2003;
138
952-959
4
UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group .
Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional
treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33).
Lancet.
1998;
352
837-853
5
Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O.
Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.
N Engl J Med.
2003;
348
383-393
6
Abraira C, Colwell JA, Nuttall FQ, Sawin CT, Nagel NJ, Comstock JP, Emanuele NV, Levin SR,
Henderson W, Lee HS.
Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on glycemic control and complications in type II
diabetes (VA CSDM). Results of the feasibility trial. Veterans Affairs Cooperative
Study in Type II Diabetes.
Diabetes Care.
1995;
18
1113-1123
7
Charbonnel B, Balarac N, Cazeneuve B, Augendre-Ferrante B, Le Thai F, Drouin P.
Schema survey. Which are the insulin treatment regimens used in France? The “Schema
survey”.
Diabetes Metab.
2001;
27
591-597
8
Implementation of treatment protocols in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.
Diabetes Care.
1995;
18
361-376
9
Hanaire-Broutin H, Melki V, Bessieres-Lacombe S, Tauber JP. The Study Group for the
Development of Pump Therapy in Diabetes .
Comparison of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injection
regimens using insulin lispro in type 1 diabetic patients on intensified treatment:
a randomized study.
Diabetes Care.
2000;
23
1232-1235
10
Doyle EA, Weinzimer SA, Steffen AT, Ahern JA, Vincent M, Tamborlane WV.
A randomized, prospective trial comparing the efficacy of continuous subcutaneous
insulin infusion with multiple daily injections using insulin glargine.
Diabetes Care.
2004;
27
1554-1558
11
Pouwels MJ, Tack CJ, Hermus AR, Lutterman JA.
Treatment with intravenous insulin followed by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion
improves glycaemic control in severely resistant Type 2 diabetic patients.
Diabet Med.
2003;
20
76-79
12
Jennings AM, Lewis KS, Murdoch S, Talbot JF, Bradley C, Ward JD.
Randomized trial comparing continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and conventional
insulin therapy in type II diabetic patients poorly controlled with sulfonylureas.
Diabetes Care.
1991;
14
738-744
13
Raskin P, Bode BW, Marks JB, Hirsch IB, Weinstein RL, McGill JB, Peterson GE, Mudaliar SR,
Reinhardt RR.
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injection therapy are
equally effective in type 2 diabetes: a randomized, parallel-group, 24-week study.
Diabetes Care.
2003;
26
2598-2603
14
American Diabetes Association .
Nutrition Principles and Recommendations in Diabetes (Position Statement).
Diabetes Care.
2004;
26
((Suppl 1))
S36-S46
15
Schernthaner G, Kopp HP, Ristic S, Muzyka B, Peter L, Mitteregger G.
Metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes using Humalog Mix50 injected three
times daily: crossover comparison with human insulin 30/70.
Horm Metab Res.
2004;
36
188-193
16
Weintrob N, Schechter A, Benzaquen H, Shalitin S, Lilos P, Galatzer A, Phillip M.
Glycemic patterns detected by continuous subcutaneous glucose sensing in children
and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus treated by multiple daily injections
vs continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.
2004;
158
677-684
17
Abraira C, Henderson WG, Colwell JA, Nuttall FQ, Comstock JP, Emanuele NV, Levin SR,
Sawin CT, Silbert CK.
Response to intensive therapy steps and to glipizide dose in combination with insulin
in type 2 diabetes. VA feasibility study on glycemic control and complications (VA
CSDM).
Diabetes Care.
1998;
21
574-579
18
Feinglos MN, Thacker CH, English J, Bethel MA, Lane JD.
Modification of postprandial hyperglycemia with insulin lispro improves glucose control
in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Care.
1997;
20
1539-1542
19
Bastyr 3rd EJ, Stuart CA, Brodows RG, Schwartz S, Graf CJ, Zagar A, Robertson KE.
Therapy focused on lowering postprandial glucose, not fasting glucose, may be superior
for lowering HbA1c. IOEZ Study Group.
Diabetes Care.
2000;
23
1236-1241
20
Bastyr 3rd EJ, Huang Y, Brunelle RL, Vignati L, Cox DJ, Kotsanos JG.
Factors associated with nocturnal hypoglycaemia among patients with type 2 diabetes
new to insulin therapy: experience with insulin lispro.
Diabetes Obes Metab.
2000;
2
39-46
21
Raskin P, Allen E, Hollander P, Lewin A, Gabbay RA, Hu P, Bode B, Garber A.
Initiating insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: a comparison between biphasic and basal
insulin analogs.
Diabetes Care.
2005;
28
260-265
22
Ilkova H, Glaser B, Tunckale A, Bagriacik N, Cerasi E.
Induction of long-term glycemic control in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients
by transient intensive insulin treatment.
Diabetes Care.
1997;
20
1353-1356
23
Wainstein J, Metzger M, Boaz M, Minuchin O, Cohen Y, Yaffe A, Yerushalmy Y, Raz I,
Harman-Boehm I.
Insulin pump therapy vs. multiple daily injections in obese Type 2 diabetic patients.
Diabet Med.
2005;
22
1037-1046
Correspondence
Y. Reznik
University of Caen · Department of Endocrinology
CHU Côte de Nacre
14033 CAEN Cedex
France
Phone: +33/231/06 45 86
Fax: +33/231/06 48 54
Email: reznik-y@chu-caen.fr